<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple, Microsoft: Birds of the same feather</title>
	<atom:link href="http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/apple-microsoft-birds-of-the-same-feather/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/apple-microsoft-birds-of-the-same-feather/</link>
	<description>Intellections on the things happening in the world of technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:55:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dizzle</title>
		<link>http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/apple-microsoft-birds-of-the-same-feather/#comment-973</link>
		<dc:creator>dizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/?p=619#comment-973</guid>
		<description>I would add that while I don&#039;t defend Microsoft very often, the EU position&#039;s is ridiculous.  Perhaps you should get over your hate to at least get basic facts right and look at the cases without emotion.

I really am eager to learn how much of the Psystar case you have read to feel qualified to write those statements.  I am guessing you haven&#039;t read even one of the filings.  I have read not only every filing but 75% of the case law cited, and 100% of the case that was significantly relied upon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would add that while I don&#8217;t defend Microsoft very often, the EU position&#8217;s is ridiculous.  Perhaps you should get over your hate to at least get basic facts right and look at the cases without emotion.</p>
<p>I really am eager to learn how much of the Psystar case you have read to feel qualified to write those statements.  I am guessing you haven&#8217;t read even one of the filings.  I have read not only every filing but 75% of the case law cited, and 100% of the case that was significantly relied upon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dizzle</title>
		<link>http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/apple-microsoft-birds-of-the-same-feather/#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>dizzle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://prosenjit23.wordpress.com/?p=619#comment-972</guid>
		<description>Please don&#039;t be so ignorant.

You say, &quot;Till date Apple has not won the case. So is there are a chance that Apple might come under the anti-trust laws at last?&quot;

Do you know ANYTHING about the case or law at all?  Let me educate you.

1.  Parties don&#039;t simply &quot;win&quot; cases out of the blue.  There is a procedure to go through.  The part of the case where there might be a &quot;winner&quot; hasn&#039;t even come close to happening.  The trial isn&#039;t scheduled until November and neither party has filed a motion for summary judgment.  Did you just pull that comment out of your rear?

2.  In this case, the anti-trust allegations were dismissed by the Court.  Did you even bother to find that out?  In that portion of the case APPLE WON.

Sheesh.  All of this stuff is public information, there is no excuse for such ignorance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t be so ignorant.</p>
<p>You say, &#8220;Till date Apple has not won the case. So is there are a chance that Apple might come under the anti-trust laws at last?&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you know ANYTHING about the case or law at all?  Let me educate you.</p>
<p>1.  Parties don&#8217;t simply &#8220;win&#8221; cases out of the blue.  There is a procedure to go through.  The part of the case where there might be a &#8220;winner&#8221; hasn&#8217;t even come close to happening.  The trial isn&#8217;t scheduled until November and neither party has filed a motion for summary judgment.  Did you just pull that comment out of your rear?</p>
<p>2.  In this case, the anti-trust allegations were dismissed by the Court.  Did you even bother to find that out?  In that portion of the case APPLE WON.</p>
<p>Sheesh.  All of this stuff is public information, there is no excuse for such ignorance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
